What Would Success (or Failure) Look Like for the Libertarian Party This Year?
June 3, 2016
32,217
916
230
3.56%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
ReasonTV Episodes Around June 3, 2016
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
3:15Now PlayingWhat Would Success (or Failure) Look Like for the Libertarian Party This Year?
Segments
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelWhat are the goalposts for the 2016 Presidential Election?
Subscribe to Reason TV for daily content like this
See the full text at Reason.com
MORE VIDEOS LIKE THIS:
WHAT HAPPENED AT THE LIBERTARIAN CONVENTION
WHY REPUBLICANS SHOULD VOTE LIBERTARIAN THIS YEAR:
WHY DEMOCRATS SHOULD VOTE LIBERTARIAN THIS YEAR:
GARY JOHNSON ON WHY HE'S THE BEST CHOICE AGAINST TRUMP AND HILLARY:
---
The Libertarian Party nominated as their president and vice president two former Republican governors, Gary Johnson of New Mexico and William Weld of Massachusetts, at their convention in Orlando, Florida over Memorial Day weekend. Reason TV was there to ask delegates and candidates what the party aims to achieve this year and what sort of vote totals and electoral breakthroughs would constitute success, or failure, for the Libertarian Party.
Watch the full video at or scroll down for downloadable versions. Approximately 3 minutes. Produced by Zach Weissmueller and Josh Swain. Music by Chris Zabriskie.
Watch all of Reason TV's coverage of the Libertarian National Convention by watching the playlist below.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.