Stossel: Mow Your Lawn or Lose Your House!
July 9, 2019
53,612
3,894
624
8.43%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
ReasonTV Episodes Around July 9, 2019
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:22Now PlayingStossel: Mow Your Lawn or Lose Your House!
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelFlorida man may lose home because he didn’t cut his grass.
---------
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes
Reason is the planet's leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines.
---------
Jim Ficken left his home to take care of his recently deceased mother's estate. While away, the man he paid to cut his lawn died. The grass in Ficken's yard grew more than 10 inches long.
The City of Dunedin has an ordinance against long grass. The Florida city fined Ficken $500 a day. Over time the fines added up to almost $30,000.
"I was shocked," Ficken tells John Stossel, "It was just amazing that they would fine me that much."
Ficken doesn't have $30,000, and now the city wants to foreclose on his home.
Ficken's lawyer, Ari Bargil of the Institute for Justice, points out that the city could have "hire[d] a lawn service to come out and mow the grass, and send Jim a bill for 150 bucks, but they didn't do that."
The reason, says Bargil, is that the city "wants the money. Code enforcement is a major cash cow for the city."
Dunedin collected $34,000 in fines in 2007. Last year, the fines ballooned to $1.3 million. "That's an almost 4,000 percent increase," Bargil tells Stossel, adding the city attorney "has called their code enforcement body a 'well-oiled machine.'"
City officials released a statement saying they "have come under recent unfair criticism." They argue that Ficken is a "repeat offender" and has a "chronic history" of not maintaining his property.
Ficken admits he is a "bit of a slob" but adds, "I got everything taken care of when they notified me."
Bargil argues Dunedin's big fines violate the 8th Amendment. That protects us not only from cruel and unusual punishment but from "excessive fines."
Stossel agrees. What's more excessive than politicians taking your home because you didn't cut your grass?
The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.