Clarence Thomas Explains Why the Court Should Have Heard Election Cases
February 22, 2021
207,743
11,829
2,982
7.13%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Rekieta Law Episodes Around February 22, 2021
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
14:27Now PlayingClarence Thomas Explains Why the Court Should Have Heard Election Cases
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelClarence Thomas issued a multi-page dissent in the court's refusal to hear a case about absentee ballot rules in Pennsylvania. Let's talk about his dissent and why it matters.
Grab some whiskey and join me.
Link to the Order
It starts on page 25 of the document
Link to @VivaFrei
Go watch his stuff! Awesome content and his livestreams with Barnes are amazing.
Come catch a livestream talkshow nearly every weekday at 11pm CST covering any and all topics. All Livestreams are Archived here
Ways to Support!
* Streamlabs donations
* Merchandise
* Subscribestar
Ways to Follow!
*Rekieta Law on MINDS
* Rekieta Media’s Twitter
* SoundCloud
* Google Play
Ways to Contact!
* Email - Rekietalaw@rekieta.org
* Actual Mail - USPS: PO Box 97, Spicer, MN 56288
Credits!
* Intro music
* Outro music
* Thumbnail
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.