No, Mahfuz, Russia’s “Oreshnik” Isn’t Unstoppable (Do the Math)

Get my "Intel Life" shirt here

Get "The Last Republic" Here

Hypersonic ≠ Unstoppable. In this breakdown I fact‑check Mahfuz Talukder’s claims about Russia’s Oreshnik missile and show why buzzwords don’t beat physics. We’ll separate ballistic from hypersonic glide, walk through plasma blackout, MIRVs and the post‑boost bus, and explain why intercept geometry (head‑on vs crossing) matters more than scary video. I also cover the November 2024 “test shot,” why you saw dummy payloads, and why cost and industrial scale make Oreshnik a terrible way to win a war.

What you’ll learn

* What “hypersonic” actually means and why ballistic re‑entry has been hypersonic for decades

* HGV vs ballistic missiles (and where Oreshnik really fits)

* Plasma sheaths, sensor limits, and the tiny window for terminal guidance

* MIRVs: old tech, new confusion — and when the warheads are released

* Why head‑on intercepts are easier than oblique shots

* Cost math: one boutique IRBM vs thousands of cheap drones

* Why “can you scale it?” beats “can you build one?”

RelatedMy debunk of the “Greater Israel” map

The original video is here: youtube.com/watch?si=UtQyn15iYpgSZ-1N&v=TLdgGWaWPTQ&feature=youtu.be

For uncensored video, check out my substack at:

Like my shirts? Get your own at:

Want a personalized greeting:

Watch all of my long form videos:

Twitter:

@ryanmcbeth

Instagram:

@therealryanmcbeth

BlueSky

@ryanmcbeth

Reddit:

/r/ryanmcbeth

Join the conversation:

Want to send me something?

Ryan McBeth Productions LLC

8705 Colesville Rd.

Suite 249

Silver Spring, MD 20910

USA