Fox News Psychos Attack Free Lunches For Kids

​@FoxNews's Martha MacCallum hosts Larry Kudlow, the former director of the National Economic Council of the United States and the current host of @FoxBusiness's "Kudlow." These two brainiacs are doing a segment on New Jersey school districts' decisions to accept an extension of pandemic-related free food distribution offerings for children from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). MacCallum and Kudlow are homing in on the fact that ALL children are eligible for a free school lunch (among other benefits), regardless of need. Fox News is concerned that this could lead children to think that all of their meals are going to be free. (Children kind of already think their meals are free.) Let's just cut to the chase: No means testing means that kids won't know which kids are poor and which kids have money, and THAT would be a very, very big missed opportunity in capitalistic indoctrination.

We stream our live show every day at 12 PM ET.

We need your help to keep providing free videos! Support the Majority Report's video content by going to

Watch the Majority Report live MF at 12 p.m. EST at youtube.com/samseder or listen via daily podcast at

Download our FREE app

SUPPORT the show by becoming a member

We Have Merch!!!

LIKE us on Facebook

FOLLOW us on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE to us on YouTube

Sam Seder: Children get free lunches that they don't pay for all the time. My kids get free lunches: I make them a lunch; they take it; they never pay for it.

Emma Vigeland: But they pay for it emotionally.

SS: Well that's true.

EV: Every time you give a Saul or Myla a sandwich, you go, "Do you know how much this is costing me? And the sweat off my back? And all of the talking that I do, yada yada yada, on my show, for you to have this turkey sandwich?? Eat it and weep." That's what you do, right?

SS: And not just for lunch. When I put down food for dinner, too. Same thing.

It seems like MacCallum is worried that there are people who don't who could pay for school lunch but aren't. But the money that we're talking about is not that significant. The amount of people who are eating lunch that could pay for it and don't. Because what it does, is it also does not stigmatize the other kids. Because this is what they want: They want to pass on this ideology that if you don't have money, you are more like a moral reprobate. There is something wrong with you. And they want this to start early. So the kids get it in elementary school, so they learn this early. That if their parents are not wealthy, then there's something wrong with them morally. And because we know how dangerous it is for kids not to be shamed because they don't have money, because then they grow up and they don't think it's money and then then they think that like the government could provide them with something like health care just by paying for taxes.

EV: They want to use hunger as a disciplinary tool, and they want that exact message communicated from a really young age. So say your parents are so morally decrepit that they are unable to provide lunch for you, you better learn that lesson. So when you grow up you be a good little worker and you contribute to this economy in the way that we want you to.