Elon Musk's 'Twitter Files' Hits New Low

Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" quickly becomes the low point of Matt Taibbi's career. How do you allow yourself to get publicly owned by an establishment hack like Debbie Wasserman Schultz? Sad.

Watch the Majority Report live MondayFriday at 12 p.m. EST on YouTube OR listen via daily podcast at

#SamSeder #EmmaVigeland #MajorityReport #politics #news #progressive #leftist #democrats #liberal

SUPPORT the show by becoming a member

Download TMR's FREE app

CHECK OUT MORE from the MR crew:

Matt Binder DOOMED

Brandon Sutton DISCOURSE

Emma Vigeland ESVN

Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING

OTHER LINKS:

Check out more from the MR crew:

Matt Binder DOOMED

Brandon Sutton THE DISCOURSE

Emma Vigeland ESVN

Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING

this clip is too good. it's the Debbie Wasserman Schultz line of questioning of Matt Taibi. and I mean when you're at the point and when you're at the point in your career where Debbie Wasserman Schultz is owning you I mean maybe you need to yeah you need to take a look at the mirror and think to yourself what have I done to get to this point. I mean it's just you just gotta watch the clip really it's something that's better seen than exploding by someone a second hand. Here's Debbie Wasserman Schultz successfully questioning Matt Taibbi. This has got to be a low point for him. it would be a low point for anyone honestly to have her be the Democratic representative to kind of school you but here you go. realistic ethics and information sources. The Society of professional journalists' code of ethics asserts that journalists should avoid political activities that can compromise Integrity or credibility. Being a republican witness today certainly casts a cloud over your objectivity. but a deeper concern that I have relates to the ethics of how journalists receive and present certain information. journalists should avoid accepting spoon-fed cherry-picked information if it's likely to be slanted in completely or designed to reach a foregone easily disputed or invalid conclusion. Would you agree with that? I think it depends. really? you wouldn't agree that a journalist should avoid spoon-fed cherry-picked information if it's likely to be slanted, incomplete, or designed to reach a foregone easily disputed, or invalid conclusion? Mrs congresswoman I've done probably a dozen stories involving whistleblowers every reported story that I've ever done across three decades involves sources who have motives. Every time you do a story you're making a balancing act. This is positive just to appreciate that The Whistleblower in this case is Elon Musk.