January 12, 2018
19
1
5.26%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
24:20Now PlayingNaureen Shah, Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project at Columbia Law School, discusses her article “Drone attacks and the Brennan doctrine;” US counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan’s admission that civilians are killed in drone strikes (after previously asserting “there hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities that we’ve been able to develop”); the rhetorical means of avoiding civilian casualties (simply call them terrorists); remotely killing people halfway around the world, based on information from paid informants or culturally ignorant inferences; the legality of drone warfare, and whether it even matters; and rumors of a “rendition 2.0? torture outsourcing program under Obama.
Check out the interview page here
For more on Scott's work:
Check out The Libertarian Institute
Read Scott's book, Fool's ErrandTime to End the War in Afghanistan
Follow Scott on Twitter using the handle @scotthortonshow
Like Scott's Facebook Page
And check out Scott's full interview archives
You can also support Scott's work by making a onetime or recurring donation at
Or you can donate per interview at Patreon
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.