March 1, 2020
137
14
10.22%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
41:10Now PlayingScott talks to Dave DeCamp about the OPCW’s efforts to discredit a pair of whistleblowers, both of whom are former employees who claim their findings were expunged from the organization’s official reports on the alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma in 2018. The OPCW concluded that there was clear evidence of the Assad government attacking its own civilians with chemical weapons, which was used as justification for the U.S. to launch a retaliatory strike. But these two former employees are adamant that the evidence did not point to such a conclusion—evidence that the OPCW intentionally ignored. Of course the mainstream media has covered basically none of this.
Check out the interview page here
For more on Scott's work:
Check out The Libertarian Institute
Read Scott's book, Fool's ErrandTime to End the War in Afghanistan
Follow Scott on Twitter using the handle @scotthortonshow
Like Scott's Facebook Page
And check out Scott's full interview archives
You can also support Scott's work by making a onetime or recurring donation at
Or you can donate per interview at Patreon
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.