Sean Fitzgerald
@ActualJusticeWarrior·516K subscribers·2.5K videos
Adnan Syed Is GUILTY
Posted
October 5, 2022
Views
87,167
Likes
3,917
Comments
1,205
Engagement
5.88%
October 5, 2022
87,167
3,917
1,205
5.88%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
32:47Now PlayingIn this video I discuss the case of Adnan Syed. I explain in detail that the supposedly exonerating evidence is nothing of the sort in great detail. The main thing I debunk the cellphone evidence controversy. The argument from the Innocence camp is that Adnan's incoming calls is not reliable for location. This is based on a piece of paper that supposedly was attached from AT&T to the records. I explain how even if taken a face value, which is a dubious notion, that does not address the outgoing call from the car dump site, shortly after the burial. Essentially if this theory is to be believed, Adnan's phone coincidentally pinged the same wrong tower twice to make it look like they were at the burial, then it accurately pinged the car drop off site shortly after for some unknown reason. This of course is insanely unlikely, yet the claim persists
Instagram NEW
2nd Channel
TeeSpring Store
Support me on Patreon
Support me on Subscribe Star
Backup Twitter
Get Storable Food
Get Pocketnet
Podcast Links:
Sources:
Original Video
Cell Phone Expert Destroys Defense
DNA Nonsense
Serial's Own Experts Fail
Call Log According To Serial
Hae Min Lee Interview
Local News Report At The Time
Mosby Betrays Family
Asia McClain Lying
Asia McClain Lying 2
Jay Interview Part 1
Jay Interview Part 2
Jay Interview Part 3
Adnan Phony Community Alibi
Adnan Motive
Interview With Prosecutor 1
Interview With Prosecutor 2
Roberta Glass Interview with Lee family Lawyer
#InnocenceFraud #AndanSyed #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
