July 22, 2020
1,135
20
5
2.20%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
5:24Now PlayingAt a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing today, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney (R-Utah) outlined the need for the United States to develop a comprehensive strategy to confront China’s growing aggression.
----
I’m concerned that we are using the traditional techniques that we’ve long had, although using them in more aggressive ways than we have to push back against China and their ambitions, but they aren’t working. China has not been diverted from the course that they are on. China is more assertive than I have ever seen in my life. During the years of Deng Xiaoping, you talked about keeping your head down and China would become stronger until the world was finally able to see how strong they were. Well, that’s happened. They are not backing down. Look what they are doing to the Uyghurs. Look what they are doing in the South China Sea bases, look how they are cracking down on Hong Kong. How they saber rattle with regards to Taiwan. The Belt and Road Initiative, the number of ports they have and bases--extraordinary. The fact that the Philippines and the Solomon Islands are changing their course with regards to the relative relationship we’ve had. Their cyber theft, putting people in our universities to steal technologies. The list goes on and on. It’s not working. The normal approach that we take with countries we aren’t happy with is not working. China represents a threat to freedom, to our economy, to our military capability, national security, are an entirely different nature than what we have faced before. This is an extraordinary assault on and simply employing the normal techniques as normal circumstances in my opinion is not going to work.
And actually the United States flexing all of our muscles is alone not strong enough because we have 330 million and they have 1.4 billion people. Their economy will be bigger. They’re already procuring as much military hardware as we are. They’re going to be an enormous power house. They’re blasting ahead and we will increasingly be in the rearview mirror unless we combine with other nations that abide by the rule of law. Unless we link arms in a very dramatic and aggressive way and lay out rules of the road that they must follow or they will find themselves disconnected, as Senator Young has described, disconnected from the economy of the rest of the world. And we’re not doing that! Instead, we’re saying “America First—everybody go off and do their own thing. Great for Brexit. Let’s blow up Europe. Everybody pursue your own interests.” And America looks like we don’t care about bringing the world together in a dramatic way. I would suggest a summit of the leaders of the major nations of the world and laying out a process to approach China in a very dramatic way. It strikes me when it comes to our China strategy—we’re like the Titanic. We’re all running around, straightening deck chairs, and playing the music as loud as we can. But we’re losing! And I look to you and ask “Am I wrong in that?” Do we need to take a wholly different level of approach to combining with our friends around the world and confronting China to let them know that they may not pursue the course they’re on and continue to have free access to our market places.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.