Sky News
@skynews·9.3M subscribers·76.1K videos
Should Brianna Ghey's killers have been named?
Posted
February 2, 2024
Views
4,973
Likes
74
Comments
12
Engagement
1.73%
February 2, 2024
4,973
74
12
1.73%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:00Now PlayingThe killers of teenager Brianna Ghey have been named for the first time, ending reporting restrictions imposed throughout their trial.
Sixteen-year-olds Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe were named ahead of receiving sentences for the murder of for the murder of 15-year-old Brianna last February.
Jenkinson was sentenced to 22 years, and Ratcliffe 20 years - but should they have been named?
On today’s episode of the #SkyNewsDailyPodcast, Niall Paterson is joined by Laura O'Brien, a children and young adults solicitor at Hodge Jones and Allen, who explains why there may be negatives in naming Brianna's murderers.
Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos
Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram
Follow us on TikTok
For more content go to and download our appsApple Android
Sky News Daily podcast is available for free here
Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí
To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
