Sky News
Sky News
@skynews·9.3M subscribers·76.1K videos

Sky analysis | Board of Peace is 'people who want to be friends with Trump'

Posted

January 22, 2026

Views

25,963

Likes

94

Comments

149

Engagement

0.94%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Donald Trump spoke at the Board of Peace signing ceremony claiming it has the potential to be "one of the most consequential bodies ever."

Sky's Adam Parsons says this Board of Peace is "constructed by people who want to be friends with Donald Trump and who want the world to know that they're friends with Donald Trump".

He adds: "It's clear that the members of the Board of Peace see this as a rethinking of the international structure, as a way of aligning themselves with an American leader".

Parsons says the Board of Peace is “clearly set up as an international organisation that will challenge the United Nations”.

Live updates

#skynews #trump #boardofpeace

SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos

The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim podcast is available for free here

Watch more Richard and Yalda videos here

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Instagram

Follow us on TikTok

For more content go to and download our appsApple Android

To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here

Guests & Subjects Covered

Donald TrumpSky's Adam ParsonsDonald Trump HeUnited Nations LiveThe WorldRichard EngelYalda HakimTwitter Like

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.