How Bad Is the Mar-A-Lago Opinion? | Talking Feds
September 6, 2022
22,658
1,403
310
7.56%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Talking Feds with Harry Litman Episodes Around September 6, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
22:14Now PlayingHow Bad Is the Mar-A-Lago Opinion? | Talking Feds
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelIt’s not easy capturing — especially in cable TV sound bites — all the legal and practical problems with the opinion granting Trump’s request for a Special Master to address both attorney-client and executive-privilege claims. We quickly convened an emergency discussion with Harry and 3 of the best and most knowledgeable commentators out there — Norm Eisen, Ryan Goodman, and Asha Rangappa — to explain the immense legal and practical problems with the opinion, which some are saying is not all that bad. In a word, the opinion is a tail wagging the dog: the judge grants an unnecessary but unproblematic review for attorney-client materials and lumps in the huge cache of public documents that Trump purloined. If the opinion holds, it would throw a monkey wrench into the whole investigation, or so we four opine. If you find the opinion is at all hard to follow, tune in.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.