Analyzing Trump’s Petition in Colorado Case and the Supreme Court’s Next Moves
January 6, 2024
24,859
1,615
242
7.47%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Talking Feds with Harry Litman Episodes Around January 6, 2024
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
33:02Now PlayingAnalyzing Trump’s Petition in Colorado Case and the Supreme Court’s Next Moves
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelHarry talks with Rick Hassen, UCLA, law, professor and election law specialist, about Trump’s petition to the Supreme Court to review the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court disqualifying him from the Colorado primary ballot. The two canvass Trump’s various arguments, identifying some notably unpromising ones and other possible winners for Court review. They discuss the Supreme Court’s likely mindset approaching the case, and which questions presented that suggests the Court may be drawn to. Finally, they predict the likely timeline of court action against the backdrop of the electoral calendar.
–
TALKING FEDS PODCAST is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.
New episodes every week! Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Apple Podcasts
Make sure to SUBSCRIBE!
Harry’s Twitter
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
BECOME A PATREON MEMBER
CONTACT US
Contact forms
Email: talkingfedspodcast@gmail.com
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.