BAN on Home Made Bourbon STRUCK DOWN by Federal Court!
April 13, 2026
5,055
594
38
12.50%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Andrew Branca Show Episodes Around April 13, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:18:31Now PlayingBAN on Home Made Bourbon STRUCK DOWN by Federal Court!
1:57Advanced Mine Warfare Threat Looms As U.S Prepares Strait Of Hormuz Sweep
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelBE HARD TO CONVICT if you’re ever compelled to use force in defense of yourself, your family, or your property! FREE WEBINAR! Saturday, April 25!
FREE but you MUST REGISTER NOW: hardtoconvict.com
All @TheBrancaShow mugs!
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month!
FOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIALFounding Fathers SPEED DIAL
TODAY’s MEMBERS-ONLY SHOW: “Trump Blockades Iran — Here's What Comes Next!”
This past Friday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down a landmark ruling in McNutt v. DOJ, striking down the federal statutes that have criminalized home distilling for over 150 years.
The law, rooted in an 1868 tax act, made it a federal crime — punishable by up to five years in prison — to operate a still in any home, yard, shed, or enclosure connected to a residence.
Remarkably, the basis for striking down the home distillation ban was the court’s finding that the Federal government had exceeded its Constitutional tax authority—in other words, a court recognized that the federal government does not have infinite authority to suppress the liberties of American citizens simply by calling that suppression “a tax.”
Today we’ll break down the Fifth Circuit's full reasoning, which rests on two constitutional pillars: the Taxation Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. I’ll explain exactly what those constitutional tests mean, how the court applied them, and what the government got wrong in its defense.
This ruling is not the end of the story — a parallel case, Ream v. DOT, is currently pending before the Sixth Circuit, meaning there's a real possibility of a circuit split and eventual Supreme Court review. And while this decision enjoins federal enforcement, state laws on home distilling remain separately on the books.
Andrew breaks down what the ruling actually does and doesn't do, what comes next legally, and why this case matters well beyond whiskey — as a serious check on the federal government's power to criminalize what Americans do inside their own homes. Subscribe to The Branca Show for expert legal analysis you won't find anywhere else, and drop your questions in the comments.
Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET as I break it all down!
Episode #1283.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.