Rachel Mitchell memo exposes gaping holes in Ford testimony
October 3, 2018
8,016
501
122
7.77%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Duran Episodes Around October 3, 2018
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
23:09Now PlayingRachel Mitchell memo exposes gaping holes in Ford testimony
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThe Duran – News in Review – Episode 124.
The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss Rachel Mitchell's memo which unequivocally exonerates Brett Kavanaugh of any of the allegations levied against him by Ford.
*****
SUPPORT US ON PATREON
VISIT. Bookmark our site
BUY. Pass by our shop and pick up a tshirt
DONATE. Every little bit helps us broadcast
VIDEO:
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Subscribe to our BitChute Channel
SOCIAL:
Find us on Gab
Follow us on Minds
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
*****
In a story not being reported on by the liberal left mainstream media, veteran sex crimes prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who was questioning Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh during the Senate committee hearing, sent a memo to Republican senators calling Ford’s allegations a “he said, she said” case that “is even weaker than that.”
Zerohedge () reports that in her 5page memo Mitchell wrote that she was presenting her “independent assessment” of the allegations. She said this was based on her independent review of the evidence and her nearly 25 years of experience. She alleged in the document that “the activities of Congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account.”
Mitchell, who worked in the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in Phoenix as the chief of the Special Victims Division, which covers sex crimes and family violence, said she was not pressured to write the memorandum and it did not necessarily reflect the views of any other senator or committee member.
“While I am a registered Republican, I am not a political or partisan person,” she wrote and added that "There is no clear standard of proof for allegations made during the Senate’s confirmation process. But the world in which I work is the legal world, not the political world. Thus, I can only provide my assessment of Dr. Ford’s allegations in that legal context.”
Noting the obvious, Mitchell wrote that a “‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them….I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
#SCOTUS #BrettKavanaugh #RachelMitchell #TheDuran
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.