January 26, 2017
8,870
194
44
2.68%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
9:22Now PlayingHelp us cover the political revolution
"One of the striking aspects of the document was its language about the agency's use of scientific research and economic analysis to justify its actions. A section titled 'Addendum on the problems with EPA science' leads with this paragraph:
EPA does not use science to guide regulatory policy as much as it uses regulatory policy to steer the science. This is an old problem at EPA. In 1992, a blue-ribbon panel of EPA science advisers that [sic] 'science should not be adjusted to fit policy.' But rather than heed this advice, EPA has greatly increased its science manipulation.
The document goes on to recommend what can be done to "improve the use of science by EPA":
EPA should not be funding scientific research
If EPA uses scientific data for regulation, that data must be publicly available so independent scientists can review it
EPA's science advisory process needs to be overhauled to eliminate conflicts of interest and inherent bias
Science standards need to be developed and implemented to ensure that science policy decisions and epidemiological practices are based on sound science"
Shop at Amazon & support TYT Nation!
Like Our Facebook Page!
Subscribe to our Network PartnerThe Young Turks.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.