November 12, 2020
17,197
1,741
206
11.32%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
18:41Now PlayingWatch the full episode here
The New York Times redefines "misinformation" as anything their reporting disagrees with politically.
Find more content at
Please support us by signing up for premium for as low as £5 a month
Sound Cloud
__________________________________________________________________________
No evidence of voter fraud headline leading on Twitter’s trending news
Election officials in dozens of states from both parties told The New York Times that there was no evidence of voting fraud, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s false narrative.
The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud
New York Times columnist blasted for claiming accurate stories are ‘right-wing misinformation’
yes, it is possible for a story to be factually accurate *and* for it to be part of a misinformation campaign
Take Breitbart, for example. All week, they have been getting huge engagement with stories about election-related "glitches,"
Thumbnail from Torrenegra "New York Times Building, NYC" (CC BY 2.0)
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.