August 13, 2026
1,634
203
11
13.10%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
2:31Now PlayingThis is the only video you’ll need to see the proof of the mainstream media’s Pro-Israel bias and complicity during the Gaza genocide. Writer and journalist Adam Johnson dug through over 12,000 articles in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN.com, Politico, Axios, USA Today, and 5,000 TV segments to find a disturbing pattern of the mainstream media’s use of emotive words that favored Israelis and demonized Palestinians.
Johnson discovered that the mainstream media often used emotive words like “massacre”, “slaughter”, “barbaric”, or “savage”, to describe the killing of Israeli’s on October 7th, but those words were rarely ever used to describe Israeli violence, even though Palestinians were “killed at a rate of 70:1.”
“Somehow, Israel managed to kill at least 12,000 children during the first year of genocide and never once, according to The New York Times and Washington Post, committed a ‘slaughter’ or a ‘massacre’ and never once acted ‘barbarically’ or ‘savagely,’ Johnson said. If this doesn’t seem statistically likely to you, check out his book, “How to Sell a Genocide,” and his reporting for The Intercept and The Real News Network.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
The Real News Network is an independent, viewer-supported, radical media network. Help us expand our in-depth analysis and coverage from Baltimore to Bangladesh by subscribing and becoming a member today!
Sign up for our newsletter
Follow TRNN:
X (Twitter)
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.