July 30, 2017
9,619
480
111
6.14%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
3:42
3:23Now PlayingScott Pruitt, the head of the EPA, is reaching out to a climate change denying right wing think tank – The Heartland Institute – for help on climate policy. Heartland specializes in spreading misinformation about climate change, and they want the organization to help them recruit a team to “review” scientific documents related to climate change to make them more industry friendly. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.
Ring of Fire needs your help! Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, has decided that his best course of action when dealing with climate science, a subject that he knows absolutely nothing about, his best course of action is to reach out to a group that knows a thing or two about climate change. In fact, the thing or two that they know is how to deny it and spread misinformation about it. That group just happens to be the Heartland Institute, a climate change denying organization that over the years has taken funding from both the Charles Koch Foundation and Exxon Mobile.
Scott Pruitt has specifically reached out to the Heartland Institute to help him put together a "Red Team", whose job it will be to go through climate change science that gets presented to the EPA so that they can go through and critique it. They can take out the parts they don't like. They can change wording and basically turn the EPA itself, into a giant climate change denying organization, much like the Heartland Institute itself.
In years past, Heartland Institute has taken out giant billboard ads featuring people like Ted Kaczynski saying, "I still believe in global warming. Do you?"
They've also created a paper that questions the science behind climate change, questions the scientist's credentials themselves, and they want to send it out to elementary and high schools all throughout this country to confuse children and teachers about what is real and what is not, with regards to climate change.
The Heartland Institute has been a disgusting organization since it's inception. But their work fighting against the climate, against the environment, is truly horrific. And the fact that Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, the fact that he's reaching out to them, as if they know more than anyone else, trying to get them to come on board. I mean, we already have former members of the Heartland Institute within the federal government right now in the interior department. And now Scott Pruitt wants to let them infect the EPA with their misinformation and climate denying tendencies.
I think Scott Pruitt often forgets that the P in EPA stands for protection. It doesn't mean you get to bring partisan politics into it. It doesn't mean that you get to bring industry insiders into it. It means that your job is to protect the environment. Not businesses. It's not the BPA. Your job is to keep American citizens safe from corporations, safe from pollution and to address the ever growing threat of climate change. And instead, he wants to reach out to one of the most disgusting climate change denying organizations out there and give them a seat at the table so they get to help direct United States climate policy.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.