October 1, 2018
13,197
788
333
8.49%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
7:46Now PlayingRecently, 16 states filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court trying to argue that these states should be allowed to fire people based on their sexual orientation alone, or their gender identity alone. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discuss this issue.
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
Recently, 16 states filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court trying to argue that these states should be allowed to fire people based on their sexual orientation alone, or their gender identity alone. These states include Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Unless I'm wrong, all of these are Republican controlled states, and the attorneys general for every one of these states signed on to this amicus brief telling the Supreme Court that if they take up an upcoming case that says that employer is allowed to fire someone for being gay, that they want to make sure that their state is allowed to let their employers do that too.
That's what's at stake here. 16 different states want to allow employers in their state to fire someone based on their sexual orientation. This is a threat to the entire LGBTQ community, as well as to everyone else. That is a thing people have to understand. You know, there's still people out there who think that, "Oh, well, it's LGBTQ. That's not me. Why should I care about this? What does this matter?" Because there's always a slope and it always starts somewhere. If you don't speak up for Group A, but you happen to be in Group B, well guess who's next on the agenda? Maybe you're in Group E, so you got five more groups that are going to go down before you do, but it is coming for you as well.
Everyone should be concerned about this, not just because, oh, it may come for me later, but because of the gross injustice that these people in the LGBTQ community have to live with every single day. A nine year old kid this week committed suicide after being bullied for coming out as gay. A nine year old kid killed himself because of that, and here we have states, 16 of them, that want to say, "You know what? We want discrimination to be legal." Their reasoning, their legal reasoning for this. is because they're arguing that the 1964 Civil Rights Act, when it mentions you can't be fired based on your sex, that only includes your sex at birth. You know? Whatever you were born with. That's the only thing it protects.
It doesn't protect any kind of gender identity later on in life, or any kind of sexual orientation, because it just says sex which means gender at birth, and so that's what we're going to go with. Totally strict interpretation of this. Laws cannot ever evolve or mean something different as things change over time. That's what these states are afraid of. Change over time, but change is inevitable. Time is inevitable, and no matter how much Republicans want to try and stop time, there is nothing they can do to stop progress from happening, so they can file their amicus briefs.
The Supreme Court may even rule in their favor, but that is not going to stop. That is not going to stop these people from trying to just live their lives, and go to work like any other human being wants to do, and be treated as an equal regardless of sexual orientation, race, religion, gender, whatever. But these states trying to take that away from people because they're run by a bunch of bigots and there is no other way to say that. To lighten things up a little bit, let's talk about climate change.
It's always a fun story. Well, in this case it actually is. You see, Texas Republican Representative John Culberson, Republican from Texas again, serves in the US House of Representatives, recently got busted taking $50,000 from his campaign funds and spending that money on trinkets and knickknacks for his office at home. When he finally got busted for it, which by the way, that is 100% illegal, he came up, he and his aides, came up with what might be the best response I've ever seen to somebody who got popped for corruption. And that is, he was buying these things because he wants to better understand climate change.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.