The Ring of Fire
@theringoffire·1.4M subscribers·27K videos
Schick Accused Of Price Discrimination For Charging Women More For Razors
Posted
July 29, 2019
Views
6,021
Likes
457
Comments
187
Engagement
July 29, 2019
6,021
457
187
10.70%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Episode Timeline
Every episode in order around the one you’re watching — click any card and the page flips straight to it.
6:14Now PlayingSign up for Top Class Actions' FREE weekly newsletter
A recent class action claims that Schick razors are unfairly priced with a “pink tax,” causing women to pay more for their products than men. Plaintiff Carla Been claims that Schick razors for women are priced higher than those sold to men, representing insidious gender discrimination in the form of the “pink tax.” “Pink Tax” refers to the widespread practice of charging more for women’s products despite being essentially the exact same product that men purchase. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this with Scott Hardy, President of Top Class Actions.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
