September 11, 2019
7,850
322
93
5.29%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
You’re on September 11, 2019. Earlier episodes are to the left, later ones to the right — the row keeps loading as you go. Click any card to open it.
Sep 11, 20196:49Now PlayingSign up for Top Class Actions' FREE weekly newsletter
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has given a class action lawsuit against Hill’s Pet Nutrition and PetSmart a second life after it overturned a district court opinion dismissing the case against the companies. Plaintiffs Holly Vanzant and Dana Land filed the class action lawsuit over claims that Hill’s “Prescription Diet” cat food was no different than less expensive non-prescription cat food. The plaintiffs filed suit against the companies under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and for unjust enrichment. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this with Scott Hardy from Top Class Actions.
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
Follow more of our stories at
Subscribe to our podcast
#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.