The Ring of Fire
The Ring of Fire
@theringoffire·1.4M subscribers·27K videos

Trump "Unlikely" To Be Prosecuted For Capitol Riot By Useless DOJ

Posted

June 25, 2022

Views

39,263

Likes

2,655

Comments

821

Engagement

8.85%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

More and more Americans are blaming Trump for the Capitol Riots, but that doesn’t mean a prosecution would be a slam dunk – far from it, actually. Mike Papantonio is joined by attorney Michael Bixby to discuss.

Become a member today!

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!

Find our merchandise at Teespring

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel

Be sociable! Follow us on:

Follow more of our stories at

Subscribe to our podcast

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

More and more Americans are blaming Trump for the Capitol riots, but that doesn't mean a prosecution is gonna be slam dunk. It's actually far from it. If you talked, if you follow the comments of anybody following the details, and frankly, I haven't followed the details, I watched parts of it. I watch reruns of things. I try to figure out what's really going on. It's very clear that these hearings need to take place because this has, this has significant ramifications. But is Trump going to be prosecuted with, with, with, with Merrick Garland, with this Department of Justice, is he gonna be prosecuted?

That, that's, probably not is the answer.

No.

And it's an incredible question, because obviously you have, you have Garland who, you know, was potentially going to the Supreme Court and, and maybe got shafted by most, by most accounts.

Yeah.

But I think Chris Christie was the one who really gave some comments recently, some insight as a former prosecutor himself. And he said, he said, the concern here is if you swing and you miss.

Mm-hmm.

What, if you swing and a miss, you're gonna be concerned about what sort of an effect that has. And basically they're looking for, to prosecute this, it's gotta be almost a guarantee. It's gotta be something that's 99.9%.

But, he goes beyond that. He says the Department of Justice is, is, is so sometimes dysfunctional. I mean, that's what it is. When, when they're so dysfunctional that unless there's a 99.9% of, of, of, of a prosecution being successful, they won't do it. That's why you see 'em going after this low hanging fruit all the time.

Right.

That's why we don't ever see 'em going after Wall Street white collar criminals who steal billions of dollars from the American public because unless it's a softball.

Right.

Especially with Merrick Garland.

Right.

They're not gonna go after this. And that's, that's what Christie says and, and it's not just Christie. There's a lot of people talking about the idea of willful blindness. The concept that they'd have to get to is that there was willful blindness on his part. I think there is. I think when you look at it, it doesn't take much to get there to conclude that. But they have to get there in front of a jury to prove intent and in, without intent, did he have an intention by way of willful blindness to allow this to happen and most of the, most of the pundits are saying no. And I agree with that.

Right. And, and I think you're right, is that the, the fundamental problem is one of saying, well, I, I don't wanna lose. I don't wanna potentially be the guy who lost a case.

Yeah.

So I'm just not gonna take it. If it's a hard case, if it's a difficult case, even if maybe there's some really strong facts, some of the stuff that we've come out and seen that is frankly uncomfortable to kind of watch, uncomfortable to see.

Yeah.

But it's like, hey, look, if this is not a guarantee, then I'm just gonna, I'm gonna go onto the next one and prosecute the guy who doesn't have any money to defend himself or the lower level person.

Yeah. Well, you always see it, don't you? I mean, and it's, it's disturbing because it's a, it's part of their culture. And when Chris Christie and these other folks are making this statement, they literally are saying, this is a Department of Justice, unless it's a softball, they're not gonna prosecute anybody. HSBC, how about that? You were involved with that whole banking issue as a lawyer. HSBC pleads to washing money for terrorism that ended up in the death of American soldiers. Yes, we did that. Yes, we washed the money. Yes, we made a hundred.

#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews

Guests & Subjects Covered

Capitol RiotsMike PapantonioMichael BixbyTeespring SpreadAnd SUBSCRIBESupport RingMerrick GarlandNo And

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.