January 9, 2023
74,880
5,470
312
7.72%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:26
4:40Now PlayingDonald Trump has not given up on his efforts to get the New York lawsuit against him and his children dismissed, even though the courts have repeatedly now told him that his arguments are absolutely idiotic. Trump was smacked down by a judge again late last week, and this time Trump's lawyers may face sanctions for filing the same tired motions that had previously been rejected. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what's happening.
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Late last week, a judge in the state of New York, judge Arthur Gerron, told Donald Trump that, no, I am not going to throw out the lawsuit that New York Attorney General Letitia James filed against you and your children. That lawsuit, of course, is the one seeking 250 million from those entities. And the reason Judge Gerron says he's not gonna throw out that lawsuit is because Donald Trump's lawyers came to court, filed the motion for, uh, uh, you know, getting the case dismissed, claimed that Leticia James doesn't have Juris diction to bring a lawsuit against Trump, which is just patently false. Then they once again claimed that this is all a political witch hunt. She can't be doing this. She's only doing it because she has a vendetta against the Trump family. And Gerran said, listen, uh, you've come to this court multiple times, you've come to the lower court multiple times and made these exact same arguments.
And when you made those arguments last time, they were thrown out of court. And essentially you were told you can't make these arguments again. You have no evidence of any of this. And some of them, as I said, are just patently false. Yes, the New York Attorney General does have jurisdiction to bring a lawsuit. Um, it's, it's kind of what they do really, to be honest with you, that's literally part of her job. You can't say that it's not. And I'm so mad Gerran went on to say that I may actually sanction your lawyers for filing these same borderline frivolous as how he defined them arguments. Because again, and I cannot stress this enough, Trump's legal teams, and he has three different law firms working on this, have already made these arguments, and they've all already been smacked down by the court system. The judges said, you can't make these arguments anymore because I'm ruling against them.
So what did Trump's legal team do? They went back and they made the same exact arguments even after being told you can't do that. So I hope they get sanctioned that that's, that that is what needs to happen. When a judge tells you not to do something and you do it anyway, you're always going to run into trouble. Now, the judge also issued a separate ruling. And this one to me is a little bit interesting because another party to this lawsuit also filed a motion recently that was Ivanka Trump. And what Ivanka Trump was doing was trying to get all of the charges just against her, dismissed, right? She didn't care about her brother, she didn't care about her dad. She had her separate legal team
Go in there and be like, Hey, judge Ivanka's a good kid, right? I mean, she's not involved in any of this, even though her name is literally on many of the documents. A lot of what happened was overseen by the area of the company that she was running. She signed off on it, literally with her signature. Yeah, just ignore all that and please dismiss Ivanka from this lawsuit. And the judge of course said, no. Why? Why would I do that? Now, Ivanka's legal team did successfully recently go to court and argue that she should be exempt from the financial monitoring that the rest of the family is under. And the only reason for that, of course, is that Ivanka is no longer with the company. So I get how that kind of makes sense, but trying to get yourself dismissed from this lawsuit when you were right at the heart of all of the alleged criminal activity taking place. Yeah, that's not gonna work. And Judge Gerran didn't let that fly either.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.