July 7, 2023
40,960
4,207
591
11.71%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Hey, Farron, I really do enjoy your insight and expertise. We keep hearing that Trump can still be president, uh, in jail as a felon. That that in itself amazes me. But my question is, most convicted of a felony lose the right to vote. So how's it possible if convicted as a felon, he can still become president in jail? Where's the justice in that? Well, I mean, technically, if he's a felon, depending on, you know, it'd be federal charges. So I don't know if he'd be allowed to vote. Obviously, if he's literally in jail, he is not allowed to vote. But he could still run. He just wouldn't be able to vote for himself. So that's the only thing that really affects. But you're right that that does suddenly present a very weird conundrum because we have a felon who's legally not even allowed to vote.
They can't even participate in democracy, but we're gonna let them control our country. Like, how can we square that as a country? Like, no, we can't trust this person to vote because they broke the law. Okay? But now you're trusting him to actually be the top law guy by controlling the country. None of it makes any sense. And I think, again, it all goes back to the founding fathers, right? I mean, they put the parameters in place on who could be the president of the United States. And I, I, I don't think they ever thought for a second, like, should, should we maybe add something saying that if you're in jail, you can't be president? And I'm sure they probably laughed and thought, really? Like, who's gonna vote for a guy in jail? Come on, let's be serious here. We're founding a country not running a comedy club.
Guys. Nobody's ever gonna vote for a felon. Well, guess what? Founding fathers we're dumber than y'all thought, right? I mean, we, we really have to be. They would be ashamed of what they created because it created what we're living in today. Um, but yeah, so it would be a very weird situation. But Trump can be president from behind bars. And of course, if he's behind bars for federal charges, then once he becomes president, his first act of business, I'm going to assume would be to give himself a full pardon, at which point he's no longer behind bars because he got the pardon, he'd get his right to vote back. So it would only be a minor setback, constitutionally speaking. So it's weird, but it is 100% a very real possibility that we may have to live with in the near future.
Thanks for watching everyone, and well, here comes the awkward part at the end of the video, where I ask you to like, comment, and share and subscribe for more content from Ring of Fire. Also, you should consider becoming a member for some exclusive content and perks, including early access videos and exclusive videos. Check out the link in the description.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.