CNN Anchor DESTROYS Republican Senator
May 3, 2024
28,358
3,016
179
11.27%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Ring of Fire Episodes Around May 3, 2024
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:20Now PlayingCNN Anchor DESTROYS Republican Senator
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelCNN anchor Kaitlin Collins absolutely wrecked Republican Senator J.D. Vance during a live interview this week when she called him out over his hypocrisy. Vance was talking about how the campus protestors who broke windows or were trespassing should be prosecuted, and Collins then asked why he has raised money for January 6th defendants who did the same thing that Vance now says is illegal. The Senator was caught completely off guard and immediately became belligerent and defensive. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what happened.
Check out our merch by visiting our store
Subscribe to our podcast
Become a member today!
Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!
Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!
Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel
Be sociable! Follow us on:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
This week, CNN Anchor, Kaitlyn Collins interviewed Republican Senator JD Vance, who for the record is widely seen to be a possible VP pick for Donald Trump this year. But JD Vance was caught a little off guard. Right? He was talking about how horrible some of these protesters are, and sure they have the right to protest on campus, but they can't break the law. 'cause if they break the law while protesting, then of course they're gonna have to face the consequences of that. And that is when Kaitlyn Collins decided to really stick it to JD Vance over his hypocrisy. And this is what happened.
Uh, but you can't police people for being anti-Israel or pro-Israel. You can police people for violating the law. And we have seen some of that with some of these protests.
Okay. So you agree that, that people who break in and vandalize a building should be prosecuted?
Exactly.
Okay. I'm just checking because you did help raise money for people who did so on January 6th, which was, you know, impeding an official proceeding, breaking into a building that they weren't allowed to be in and vandalizing the capitol.
Well, Caitlyn, I know that this is the obsession of the national medias to talk about what happened two years ago, three years ago, on January 6th, as opposed
As to talk about the future issue. Not, not if it's not obsession, just if it's a double
Standard. No, let me, no, let me, let me answer the question, Caitlyn. I mean, look, here, here's my, been my basic argument about January the sixth. If you beat up a cop, of course you deserve to go to prison. If you violated the law, uh, you should suffer the consequences. But there are people who protested on January the sixth, who have had the complete weight of the Justice Department thrown at them,
First and foremost. Uh, full accolades there to Kaitlyn Collins, brilliantly handled. That's what you're supposed to do. Loved every second of it. Uh, second of all, JD Vance's response, right? Well, the media is so obsessed with things that happened. I was you two, three years ago. Oh my God, get over it. Guys. Like immediately becoming defensive, immediately resorting to be like, you are obsessed with this, like personal attacks, not actually defending any position. Right? And then he goes, well, I mean, you know, if, if they were assaulting police officers, but a lot of 'em are just walking around and, you know, that's, it is not fair. Actually, let me go ahead and point something out to you, jd, something that I know you already know, you're just choosing to ignore because it fits your political agenda. They're very presence, they're very presence. On the other side of those barricades was trespassing at a federal building.
That building was off limits for the day. They were legally not allowed to be there on those sides of the barricades if they stayed on the other side. No problem. Those people, by the way, are not being arrested. And you're like, well, if they assaulted police officers or, you know, maybe broke some windows, sure they could be arrested. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









