The Wall Street Journal
@wsj·6.6M subscribers·28.9K videos
Without Scalia, Court's Oral Arguments Will Change
Posted
February 18, 2016
Views
3,080
Likes
24
Comments
1
Engagement
February 18, 2016
3,080
24
1
0.81%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
You’re on February 18, 2016. Earlier episodes are to the left, later ones to the right — the row keeps loading as you go. Click any card to open it.
Feb 18, 20163:05Now PlayingJustice Antonin Scalia brought a unique voice to the Supreme Court. He often invoked humor but was also a tough interrogator. Here's how the nature of oral arguments before the court could change in his absence. Photo: Pete Marovich/Zuma Press
Subscribe to the WSJ channel here:
More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com
Follow WSJ on Facebook
Follow WSJ on Google+
Follow WSJ on Twitter
Follow WSJ on Instagram
Follow WSJ on Pinterest
Don’t miss a WSJ video, subscribe here
More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com
Visit the WSJ Video Center
On Facebook
On Snapchat
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
