Crazy Homeless Woman Arrested for Trespassing in Hoboken, NJ – PART 3

PART 1 July 27, 2022

PART 2 September 30, 2022

PART 4 March 10, 2023

PART 5 January 29, 2024

PART 6 February 17, 2024

PART 7 May 31, 2024

Around 1:37 AM on November 21, 2022, officers with the Hoboken Police Department were dispatched to Basile’s Pizza based on a report of a disorderly female who was screaming at an Uber driver parked outside. The woman had allegedly thrown a planter vase through the rear passenger window of the Uber driver’s vehicle. Upon arrival, the officers recognized the suspect as 36-year-old Jessica Rosewall. As a homeless woman living in Hoboken, Jessica was already known to Hoboken Police.

As the officers spoke with Jessica, they noticed that she was incoherent and detected the odor of alcohol. As they attempted to gather information, Jessica continued to yell at the officers. Based on her behavior and the witness account of what happened, Jessica was placed under arrest for Criminal Mischief and Disorderly Conduct and transported to police HQ. At police HQ, Jessica refused to be fingerprinted. Jessica was charged with the following: Criminal Mischief (2C:33-2), Disorderly Conduct (2C:17-3), and Refusal to be Fingerprinted (53:1-15)

---------------------------------------------------------------

Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and consider supporting this channel (email us for more information). Donations will be used to acquire more public footage related to law enforcement activities.

Our content is educational and in compliance with YouTube's Fair Use Policy because we edit several long clips into a concise story. This is similar to other law enforcement channels on YouTube. All videos and case documents were obtained pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq. (P.L. 2001, c. 404). Defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty.

The New Jersey Supreme Court has previously affirmed in Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group, 993 A.2d 778 (2010) that “The fair-report privilege reflects the judgment that the need, in a self-governing society, for free-flowing information about matters of public interest outweighs concerns over the uncompensated injury to a person's reputation.” This video advances a compelling public interest. The summary of events was based on records that are “open to public view through open access to public records” as defined in the Salzano case. In Ramos v. Flowers, 429 N.J. Super. 13, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court has also affirmed the right to film law enforcement interactions.