September 7, 2026
68
16
3
27.94%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
26:09Now PlayingAround 7:22 PM on January 1, 2025, Officers Peter DeSerres and Wilson Morales with the Township of Union Police Department were dispatched to Target (2960 Route 22 East) on a report of 2 shoplifters who were being detained in the loss prevention office. They arrived on scene around 7:28 PM and made contact with both thieves in the Asset Protection office.
The suspects identified themselves as Chemani Linton and Tro’Vonta Burgess, but they both lied to the officers by providing them with false dates of birth. They were both placed under arrest for shoplifting and transported together to the Township of Union Police Department. At the station, they were photographed, fingerprinted, and advised of their charges.
It was later determined that the total value of the health, beauty, and cleaning products that they attempted to steal from Target was $500.61. Both Chemani and Tro’Vonta were charged with shoplifting under 2C:20-11B(2) and hindering by providing false information (2C:29-3B(4)). After the officers finished processing them at the station, they were both released with summonses pending their court appearances.
Court records indicate that on June 12, 2025, Tro’Vonta’s charge of shoplifting was downgraded to disorderly conduct (Ordinance 250-1), while his hindering charge was dismissed. As a result of his conviction, Tro’Vonta had to pay a total of $1,033 in fines. Tro’Vonta has previously been arrested for shoplifting (2C:20-11B(1)) in Union Township, NJ on November 14, 2019.
As far as Chemani’s charges, her shoplifting charge was also downgraded to disorderly conduct (Ordinance 250-1) on October 9, 2025, while her hindering charge was dismissed. Chemani had to pay a total of $633 in fines as a result of her conviction.
----------------------------------------------
Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and consider supporting this channel (email us for more information). Our content is shared for educational and news gathering purposes. We are in compliance with YouTube's Fair Use Policy because we edit several long clips into a concise story. This is similar to other law enforcement channels on YouTube. All videos and case documents were obtained pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq. (P.L. 2024, c.16). Defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty.
The New Jersey Supreme Court has previously affirmed in Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group, 993 A.2d 778 (2010) that “The fair-report privilege reflects the judgment that the need, in a self-governing society, for free-flowing information about matters of public interest outweighs concerns over the uncompensated injury to a person's reputation.” This video advances a compelling public interest. The summary of events was based on records that are “open to public view through open access to public records” as defined in the Salzano case. In Ramos v. Flowers, 429 N.J. Super. 13, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court has also affirmed the right to film law enforcement interactions.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.