Uncivil Law
Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos

Bacon Bitch v. Breakfast Bitch

Posted

August 2, 2019

Views

680

Likes

21

Comments

5

Engagement

3.82%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Youtube seems to be shadowbanning me. Not sure why :) Like, comment, subscribe, blah blah blah :)

Anywho, this is the case of Bacon Bitch v. Breakfast Bitch. Bacon Bitch is a successful restaurant in the Miami, FL area. A couple had such a great time there, they decided to open their own restaurant "inspired by" Bacon Bitch, called Breakfast Bitch.

Breakfast Bitch copied several elements of the Bacon Bitch concept, including several menu items and recipes.

Bacon Bitch alleges actual confusion in the marketplace, which is a trademark issue. A Yelp employee, asked by Breakfast Bitch to help set up its Yelp page, expressed confusion, and there is some other evidence of confusion in the market place.

The question therefore is: Did Breakfast Bitch illegally take elements from Bacon Bitch, to the point there is a violation of the Lanham Act?

I also express my support for both bottomless mimosas in specific and bitches in general. I want all bitches everywhere to thrive! #YouGoGirl

Guests & Subjects Covered

Bacon BitchBreakfast Bitch Bacon BitchMiami FLBreakfast Bitch Breakfast BitchA YelpBreakfast BitchDid Breakfast BitchLanham Act I

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Bacon Bitch v. Breakfast Bitch · Uncivil Law · Sentinel