Uncivil Law
Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos

Air & Liquid Systems v Devries

Posted

August 6, 2019

Views

251

Likes

18

Comments

3

Engagement

8.37%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Air & Liquid Systems sold a product that was designed to be combined with an asbestos component to the US Navy. The asbestos lead to cancer.

The issue is the liability of Air & Liquid. Air & Liquid didn't sell the asbestos, but they did sell a part that was intended to be combined with asbestos in its intended use, and it was in fact used in the way intended and for the intended purpose.

The issue is essentially proximate cause. Is Air & Liquid systems close enough to the injury to be held responsible, or does the fact that Air & Liquid did not sell the part that actually caused the injury enough to insulate them from liability?

Guests & Subjects Covered

Liquid SystemsUS Navy TheLiquid AirIs Air

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Air & Liquid Systems v Devries · Uncivil Law · Sentinel