Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos
What is executive privilege? Discussing US v Nixon
Posted
October 15, 2019
Views
492
Likes
21
Comments
3
Engagement
4.88%
October 15, 2019
492
21
3
4.88%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
46:17Now PlayingWith special guest Tactical Bra, from the Lawful Masses discord!
--
It Had Been 44 years ago the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a Deadly Blow to President Richard Nixon's presidency, decided that caused the launch of the Watergate tapes.
The Event of United States v. Nixon reached the Court on July 8, 1974, after it had concluded its former term. The Justices found themselves in new territory as the Court had to take care of an executive order claim registered by President Nixon's lawyers.
A grand jury had returned indictments against seven Nixon aides, Including former Attorney General John Mitchell, within their Watergate investigation. Leon Jaworski, a special prosecutor appointed by President Nixon, along with the seven defendants desired access to audio tapes of conversations recorded by President Nixon from the White House.
Nixon contended that the Idea of executive privilege gave him Capability to withhold sensitive data, like the tapes, out of other government branches to be able to keep confidential communications inside the executive branch and also to secure the national attention.
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Court (with Justice Rehnquist not Participate because of a prior function in the Nixon administration) ruled against the President. Chief Justice Warren Burger reported that the President did not possess an absolute, unqualified privilege to withhold data.
"We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in a criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice. The generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial," Burger said.
Since the Supreme Court drama has been unfolding, the House Judiciary Committee worked on three articles of impeachment against President Nixon. The signs about the tapes was crucial to this approaching House impeachment proceedings against Nixon.
The Court ordered the tapes published as soon as possible following a Judge had listened to the tapes to determine they had been applicable to this Trial of the former Nixon aides. Approximately two weeks following the Supreme Court's conclusion, President Nixon resigned from office.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
