Uncivil Law
Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos

Footnote: The decision in Castle Rock v. Gonzales (7-2)

Posted

December 3, 2019

Views

907

Likes

31

Comments

11

Engagement

4.63%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

In today's video (), I mention the case we discussed was not new law. So, let's turn to the precedent.

This is the announcement of the decision from the court (7-2), holding no liability for the decision by the police not to enforce a restraining order against a father who abducted his three children from the custody of the mother.

Chief Justice Rehnquist (who speaks briefly at the beginning) would die a few months later of thyroid cancer, so that is why he sounds as bad as he does.

Just the announcement of the opinion today. No commentary from me.

The police have no duty to protect you.

Guests & Subjects Covered

FootnoteChief Justice Rehnquist

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Footnote: The decision in Castle Rock v. Gonzales (7-2) · Uncivil Law · Sentinel