Search valid against both drug dealer and girlfriend - legal analysis & reaction
January 30, 2020
540
30
5
6.48%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Uncivil Law Episodes Around January 30, 2020
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
16:55Now PlayingSearch valid against both drug dealer and girlfriend - legal analysis & reaction
YouTube Description
as posted by the channel#exclusionary rule #4thAmendment #suppression
Angela Hamm lived with David Hamm, who himself was on parole. As a condition of his parole, David signed a consent that his property could be searched.
The police came into information that David Hamm was a drug dealer. Using the signed consent from parole, the police entered David's house without a warrant. During the search, they discovered drug making equipment, and arrested both David and Angela.
In today's legal analysis and reaction, we discuss when the police can search a property without a warrant as a condition of parole, and when evidence is discovered, if that evidence can also be used against another person who was not on parole and who did not sign a consent.
----
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf)
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Social
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.