Convict asks for 10 year reduction due to law change
February 10, 2020
416
40
2
10.10%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Uncivil Law Episodes Around February 10, 2020
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
14:18Now PlayingConvict asks for 10 year reduction due to law change
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelRamon Hueso was convicted for drug related offenses and sentenced to 20 years in prison. After his conviction, congress changed the law in such a way that were he sentenced today, he would only have been sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Hueso sues, arguing that the change by congress was merely a clarification of what the law had always been, rather than a substantive change. If Hueso was right, then the law said (substantively) exactly what it says now, which means his sentence was a legal error.
In today's legal analysis, we learn more about this change, why it went into effect, and whether Hueso can get a 10 year break on his conviction.
----
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf)
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Social
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









