Why the Supreme Court couldn't prevent gerrymandering
March 24, 2020
634
43
12
8.68%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Uncivil Law Episodes Around March 24, 2020
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
17:25Now PlayingWhy the Supreme Court couldn't prevent gerrymandering
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelGerrymandering is the process of creating voting district boundaries to favor (or disfavor) a political party. Recently, a sitting federal judge wrote a law review article (a formal, professional publication) that criticized the Robert's Supreme Court for, among other things, not solving the gerrymandering problem when the court had the chance recently.
In this legal discussion, I explain the constraints on the Supreme Court, and why the decision from the Supreme Court couldn't have come out any other way.
----
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitter
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord (blackleaf)
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.