February 4, 2022
8,345
626
55
8.16%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
2:38:21Now PlayingFacts of the case
--
The day before Election Day in 2018, Senator Ted Cruz loaned Ted Cruz for Senate (“Cruz Committee”) two campaign finance loans totaling $260,000. After Election Day, the Cruz Committee used the funds it had on hand to pay vendors and meet other obligations instead of repaying the loans to Senator Cruz. Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and its implementing regulations place a $250,000 limit on the amount of post-election contributions that may be used to pay back a candidate's pre-election loans more than 20 days after Election Day. After 20 days had elapsed, the balance of those loans that exceeded BCRA's $250,000 statutory cap on post-election contributions ($10,000)—converted into a campaign contribution. The Cruz Committee filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate and enjoin enforcement of Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and its implementing regulations as violating constitutional and administrative laws.
A three-judge court ruled for Cruz, finding that the restrictions place a burden on political speech without adequate justification.
Question
---
Do appellees have standing to challenge the statutory loan-repayment limit of 52 U.S.C. § 30116(j), and does the limit unconstitutionally burden political speech without justification?
Cite this page
Email uncivil law at uncivillawyt@gmail.com
Join Uncivil Law at uncivillaw.locals.com or patreon.com/uncivillaw (locals preferred)
Donate to uncivil law at
Follow Uncivil Law on Discord
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitter
Follow Uncivil Law on Facebook
Follow Uncivil Law on Instagram
Follow Uncivil Law on Twitch
Camera: Sony A5100
Lens: Sigma 30mm F 1.4
Mic: Rode NT1A
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
SwuM, Ben Belial Reflect
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.