Uncivil Law
Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos

Oral Arguments in Sackett v. EPA

Posted

October 11, 2022

Views

4,238

Likes

419

Comments

57

Engagement

11.23%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Facts of the case

---

Michael and Chantall Sackett own a residential lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, and want to build a home there. However, shortly after they began placing sand and gravel, the federal Environmental Protection Agency told them that they could not build on their lot because construction on the land violated the Clean Water Act. According to the EPA, the Sacketts’ lot contained wetlands that qualify as “navigable waters” regulated by the Act, so they needed to remove the sand and gravel and restore the property to its natural state.

Litigation ensued, and in 2012, the Supreme Court permitted the Sacketts to litigate their challenge to the EPA’s order in federal court. During the litigation, the EPA removed its compliance order.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the EPA’s withdrawal of the compliance order did not render the Sacketts’ challenge moot and that the EPA does have jurisdiction over their property under the Clean Water Act. The court reasoned that, under binding circuit precedent, “jurisdiction over wetlands depends upon the existence of a significant nexus between the wetlands in question and navigable waters in the traditional sense.”

Question Presented

---

What is the proper test for determining whether wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act?

Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★

➡️ MERCHANDISE ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON INSTA ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON FB PAGE ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON DISCORD ➜

🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜

🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ business@uncivillawllc.com

🚨 Join Uncivil Law at ➜ uncivillaw.locals.com

Travel Camera

Mic Interface

Background Lights

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

SwuM, Ben Belial Reflect

Guests & Subjects Covered

Chantall SackettPriest Lake IdahoEnvironmental Protection AgencyClean Water Act AccordingSupreme CourtThe US CourtNinth CircuitClean Water Act The

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.