Oral Arguments in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith
October 28, 2022
4,798
481
31
10.67%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Uncivil Law Episodes Around October 28, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
2:17:47Now PlayingOral Arguments in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelFacts of the case
Artist Andy Warhol created a series of silkscreen prints and pencil illustrations (“Prince Series”) based on a copyrighted 1981 photograph of the musician Prince, taken by Lynn Goldsmith. Warhol made some aesthetic changes to Goldsmith’s original photograph, but they remained “recognizably derived” from the original.
Goldsmith sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, successor to Warhol’s copyright in the Prince Series, for copyright infringement. The Foundation raised fair use as a defense. The district court granted summary judgment for the Foundation, concluding that Warhol had “transformed” the original photograph by giving it a new “meaning and message.” The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, holding that because the Prince Series remained “recognizably derived” from the original, it failed to transform and was thus not fair use.
Question
What is the proper test for whether a work is “transformative” under the first factor of the Copyright Act’s fair use doctrine?
★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★
➡️ MERCHANDISE ➜
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON INSTA ➜
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER ➜
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON FB PAGE ➜
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH ➜
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON DISCORD ➜
🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜
🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ business@uncivillawllc.com
🚨 Join Uncivil Law at ➜ uncivillaw.locals.com
Travel Camera
Mic Interface
Background Lights
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
SwuM, Ben Belial Reflect
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.