Uncivil Law
Uncivil Law
@uncivillaw·160K subscribers·3.8K videos

Reaction to National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

Posted

November 10, 2022

Views

5,618

Likes

425

Comments

78

Engagement

8.95%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

#reaction #react #reactionvideo

Facts of the case

In 2018, California voters passed Proposition 12, which amends the California Health and Safety Code to prohibit the sale of pork from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with California standards. Trade associations representing the pork industry and farmers challenged the law as violating the dormant Commerce Clause, which prohibits states from discriminating against interstate commerce or imposing undue burdens on interstate commerce.

According to the challengers, Proposition 12 places an undue burden on interstate commerce and that it causes an impermissible “extraterritorial effect” because it effectively forces all or most hog farmers, regardless of their location, to comply with the California requirements yet mostly affects non-California transactions (because 87% of the pork produced in the country is consumed outside of California).

The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, finding the complaint did not plausibly plead that Proposition 12 violates the dormant Commerce Clause under either theory.

Question

Does a California law that prohibits the in-state sale of pork from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with California standards violate the “dormant” component of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause?

Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★

➡️ PO BOX ➜

➡️ MERCHANDISE ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON INSTA ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON FB PAGE ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH ➜

➡️ FOLLOW ME ON DISCORD ➜

🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜

🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ business@uncivillawllc.com

🚨 Join Uncivil Law at ➜ uncivillaw.locals.com

Travel Camera

Mic Interface

Background Lights

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

SwuM, Ben Belial Reflect

Guests & Subjects Covered

California HealthSafety CodeCommerce ClauseCalifornia TheUS CourtNinth CircuitQuestion DoesConstitutions Commerce Clause Produced

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.