Wisner Baum
Wisner Baum
@wisnerbaum·23.9K subscribers·1.7K videos

Widow Sues GSK Over Husband’s Alleged Paxil-Induced Suicide - NBC 5 Chicago

Posted

April 14, 2017

Views

1,198

Likes

17

Comments

3

Engagement

1.67%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

► A case in Chicago federal court has the potential to change the prescription drug landscape, per NBC 5 Chicago. Aired in May of 2014, this video tells the story behind lifelong Chicagoan Stewart Dolin’s alleged Paxil-induced suicide, and his wife’s subsequent lawsuit against the maker of Paxil, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

On July 10, 2010, 57-year-old Stewart Dolin began taking the prescription antidepressant medication paroxetine, the generic version of Paxil. GSK researched, developed, manufactured and marketed Paxil, which is the same chemical compound as paroxetine, and both use the same product information labeling.

On the afternoon of July 15, 2010, a nurse at a subway station near Washington Street in Chicago noticed Stewart Dolin pacing back and forth while looking in the direction of an approaching train that was not yet in sight. When the moving train appeared, the nurse observed Mr. Dolin leap onto the tracks, where he was struck. Ultimately, Mr. Dolin was pronounced dead from the injuries he suffered due to the collision and his contact with the electrified track after the collision.

The lawsuit alleges GSK failed to adequately warn Mr. Dolin’s doctor about Paxil/paroxetine’s association with an increased risk of suicidal behavior in adults of all ages. The Court previously ruled that while GSK did not manufacture the pills Mr. Dolin ingested, the company was nonetheless responsible for the label and knew or should have known any failure to warn would result in harm to those taking generic versions of the drug.

Generic drug makers are not permitted by law to change the labels produced by brand name drug makers – they are required to duplicate the language provided by the brand word for word. So, if a consumer alleges that a generic drug caused them harm, they are in what Dolin’s attorney, Brent Wisner, characterizes as a “donut hole of liability.”

"That's where you have the generic maker on one hand saying, 'We don't know about these risks. We can't be held responsible for them... plus, we can't change the label,'" Wisner told NBC 5 in a special report on the Dolin case. "And the brand name makers are saying, 'Well, we didn't make the pill.'"

According to Wisner, "the label as it existed was not sufficient… In fact, it says the risk of suicide does not extend beyond the age of 24. That's in the Black Box, the first thing you read. And that is factually incorrect and misleading."

Click here to subscribe to Baum Hedlund’s YouTube Channel

Let’s Connect!

Guests & Subjects Covered

NBC 5 ChicagoChicago AiredChicagoan Stewart DolinsStewart DolinPaxil GSKWashington StreetMr DolinUltimately Mr Dolin

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.