August 20, 2026
44,341
1,816
396
4.99%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
10:43Now PlayingIn this clip from The Zach Costello Show, Zach breaks down Patrick Bet-David's behind-the-scenes account of the Andrew Wilson vs. Candace Owens debate, including the intense negotiations and legal back-and-forth that nearly prevented the debate from happening. Zach also examines the controversy surrounding the $300,000 being placed into escrow and the conditions attached to the agreement.
The discussion then turns to PBD's assessment of who won the debate. While PBD argues that both Candace and Andrew came away with a victory for different reasons, Zach questions whether Andrew's increased exposure and return on his $300,000 investment can really be considered a debate win. Zach argues that Candace was more successful at convincing viewers and raising further questions about the Charlie Kirk case.
Throughout the segment, Zach examines the debate's massive reach across social media and argues that the most important question is whether either side actually changed people's minds.
Watch the full video for Zach's complete breakdown and share your thoughts in the comments below.
-- -- --
🔔 LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day
▶️ Watch the full episode here
Subscribe and Follow Me Here👇🏼
Zach Costello
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.