Bloomberg News
@Bloomberg-News·2.8M subscribers·40.1K videos
Uber And Lyft Drivers Say Companies Abandon Them In Crisis
Posted
April 3, 2020
Views
3,734
Likes
48
Comments
15
Engagement
1.69%
April 3, 2020
3,734
48
15
1.69%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
0:40
3:21Now Playing“The companies were very quick to abandon us," said Tyler Sandness, a Lyft driver and organizer of Rideshare Drivers United. His organization are campaigning for "fair pay and a voice" in their jobs.
Sandness describes how Uber and Lyft drivers are impacted by the global coronavirus pandemic.
On April 2, a federal judge issued a sharp warning to Lyft -- and other gig-economy companies that operate in California -- that refusing to treat drivers like employees is “really disregarding the rule of law.”
During a hearing over a demand by drivers for sick pay during the coronavirus outbreak, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said Thursday the refusal to reclassify drivers from independent contractors to employees violates a new California law, Assembly Bill 5, aimed at making it easier for workers to qualify for an array of workplace benefits from health care to overtime.
“It’s obvious that A.B. 5 applies by its terms to its drivers, and A.B. 5 was intended to apply to” companies like Lyft, Chhabria told lawyers during a teleconference. Lyft and other companies that resist reclassifying drivers “are really disregarding the rule of law,” he said.
Lyft said a majority of drivers prefer to remain contractors.
“We believe drivers, most of whom have other full or part time work and only drive a few hours a week at most, are properly classified as independent contractors,” the company said in a statement. “This is a complex issue that affects hundreds of thousands of people.”
The judge’s observations about the broader gig economy, and the implicit threat to its business model, amounted to a small sliver of Thursday’s hearing.
But his warning will probably prove important because Lyft, Uber and other firms that save millions of dollars in labor costs relying on independent contractors are engaged in multiple court battles over A.B. 5. It may be the first time a federal judge has so clearly articulated an opinion that the companies are on the wrong side of the law.
The hearing ended with no ruling from Chhabria on a request by Lyft drivers, under a different state law, for three additional sick days annually to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic.
The judge cautioned that if he did order the company to revise its sick-leave policy, drivers might end up forfeiting benefits under a federal emergency law -- the same advice a different judge gave to Uber drivers Wednesday. Both Lyft and Uber have offered limited benefits to drivers sickened by the virus.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
QUICKTAKE ON SOCIAL:
Follow QuickTake on Twitter: twitter.com/quicktake
Like QuickTake on Facebook: facebook.com/quicktake
Follow QuickTake on Instagram: instagram.com/quicktake
Subscribe to our newsletter
Email us at quicktakenews@gmail.com
QuickTake by Bloomberg is a global news network delivering up-to-the-minute analysis on the biggest news, trends and ideas for a new generation of leaders.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
