Bloomberg Podcasts
@bloombergpodcasts·503K subscribers·32.4K videos
Trump Tariff Power Met with Supreme Court Skepticism
Posted
November 6, 2025
Views
12,620
Likes
63
Comments
6
Engagement
0.55%
November 6, 2025
12,620
63
6
0.55%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:37Now PlayingTobin Marcus, Head of US Public Policy at Wolfe Research, discusses the President's tariff powers and the legality behind them as the Supreme Court is set to decide their fate in the coming months.
The US Supreme Court appeared skeptical of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, as key justices suggested he had overstepped his authority with his signature economic policy.
In an argument session that lasted more than 2 1/2 hours Wednesday, three members of the court’s conservative majority questioned Trump’s use of an emergency-powers law to collect tens of billions of dollars in tariffs a month.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the tariffs were an “imposition of taxes on Americans and that has always been the core power of Congress.” Justice Neil Gorsuch also signaled he was a probable vote against the president, and fellow Trump appointee Amy Coney Barrett asked probing questions of both sides.
A decision against Trump could force more than $100 billion in refunds, remove a major burden on the US importers that are paying the tariffs, and blunt an all-purpose cudgel the president has wielded against trading partners. More broadly, it would be by far the Supreme Court’s most significant pushback against Trump’s assertions of powers that go well beyond those claimed by his White House predecessors.
The court’s three liberal justices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — also expressed doubt about the legality of the tariffs. A ruling could come as quickly as the end of the year, given the ultra-expedited schedule the Supreme Court has set so far.
The atmosphere Wednesday was unusually relaxed for a court that is often sharply divided, with laughter punctuating the arguments several times. At one point, Kagan playfully needled Roberts after he seemed to confuse her and Sotomayor, who had just finished asking a round of questions.
“No, she’s Justice Sotomayor. She just finished,” Kagan quipped.
The case involves Trump’s April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs, which impose taxes of 10-50% on most US imports depending on the originating country. Trump says those duties are warranted to address the longstanding national trade deficit. The high court clash also covers separate tariffs Trump said he imposed on Canada, Mexico and China to address fentanyl trafficking.
--------
Watch Bloomberg Radio LIVE on YouTube
Weekdays 7am-6pm ET
Follow us on X
Subscribe to our Podcasts:
Bloomberg Daybreak
Bloomberg Surveillance
Bloomberg Intelligence
Balance of Power
Bloomberg Businessweek
Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app:
Apple CarPlay
Android Auto
Visit our YouTube channels:
Bloomberg Podcasts
Bloomberg Television
Bloomberg Originals
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
