May 11, 2018
2,509
12
17
1.16%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) discusses the fate of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Trump administration's rhetoric around trade and it being a "bad deal."
» Subscribe to CNBC
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news
Find CNBC News on Facebook
Follow CNBC News on Twitter
Follow CNBC News on Google+
Follow CNBC News on Instagram
Sen. Pat Toomey: Trump Doesn't Have Authority To Exit NAFTA | CNBC
Sen. Pat Toomey told CNBC on Friday the Trump administration doesn't have the unilateral authority to pull out NAFTA.
"NAFTA wasn't a treaty. It's an agreement," the Pennsylvania Republican said on "Squawk Box."
"The president doesn't have any more authority to repeal that law any more than he has authority to repeal Obamacare or change taxes," he contended.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, a trilateral trade deal between the U.S., Canada and Mexico, was passed by Congress in 1993 during Bill Clinton's presidency. It went into effect in 1994.
President Donald Trump has been threatening to pull out of NAFTA if a better agreement cannot be reached. Trade officials have been trying to wrap up negotiations and reach a new deal before Mexico's presidential election on July 1.
However, the latest round of talks made little headway in Washington this week as the U.S. and Mexico sought to settle differences over the key issue of autos, three well-placed sources told Reuters. The Trump administration wants requirements to boost the U.S. content of vehicles.
Toomey wrote an op-ed in Friday's Wall Street Journal arguing the historic deal should be renegotiated rather than completely uprooted.
"Ideally, we get the outline of a good constructive agreement that modernizes NAFTA, doesn't move in a protectionist direction," he said.
His list of improvements includes protecting intellectual property, adjusting Canada's diary tariffs and raising the dollar cap amount of duty-free goods to Mexico.
However, the senator said he's not in favor of tightening rules of origin and content requirements.
"That's contrary to the spirit of NAFTA and having a free trade agreement," Toomey said.
He's also not in favor of the so-called Sunset Provision that "introduces a complete uncertainty about how long this is going to last."
The best possible outcome, he argued, is an improvement of the existing deal.
"What I'm urging is, don't negotiate a protectionist agreement and then threaten to pull out from the current agreement and tell Republican pro-trade senators, well, here's your choices: this lesser NAFTA or nothing," Toomey said.
"I think, Republican senators are pro-trade, and pro-NAFTA," he said. "So the support would be there if it's a good agreement."
House Speaker Paul Ryan set a May 17 deadline to be notified of a new NAFTA trade deal in the hopes that Congress will approve it.
Toomey said the Trump administration "has a fight on their hands" if it tries to pull out of NAFTA without the consent of Congress.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.