COURT DRAMA EXPLODES: Blake Lively’s Desperate RETALIATION HUMILIATES Her, Not Wallace

Blake Lively has filed yet another motion, this time demanding attorneys’ fees, treble damages, and punitive damages under California’s new section 47.1 law. This latest filing does not appear to be a victory; it seems more like a retaliatory move. After Wallace dismantled her California arguments, Blake is now pushing a motion that cannot even apply in New York, desperate to reframe herself as the prevailing party despite having no actual win. With three separate asks for sanctions and fees still unanswered by the judge, this move highlights just how shaky her case really is.

#ItEndsWithUs #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni

Support the Channel By Becoming a Member:

Follow Katie Joy on Social Media:

Facebook:

Disclaimer:

Without a Crystal Ball is a commentary channel. The views expressed by Katie Joy are her opinions and should not be considered fact. Katie Joy discusses trending topics, current events, reality tv & More. This channel is for your entertainment. Please make sure you conduct your own research on any topics to verify any information.

All Clips Obtained through TLC YouTube & Used under Fair Use:

The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”

THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.