Dr John Campbell
Dr John Campbell
@campbellteaching·3.3M subscribers·3.1K videos

Distance, masks and eye protection

Posted

June 2, 2020

Views

84,276

Likes

2,932

Comments

613

Engagement

4.21%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Lancet, Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to

prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and

COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1st June, COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE)

)311429/fulltext

)311831/fulltext

Methods

Meta-analysis

Physical distance, face masks, eye protection

172 observational studies, 16 countries, 6 continents

N = 25, 697, patients with Covid-19, SARS, MERS

No randomised controlled trials

Physical distance

Less than 1 metre = 13% risk

More than 1 metre, 3% risk

2 metres = 1.5% risk

3 metres = 0.75% risk

Face masks

N = 2,647

Wearing a mask risk = 3% risk of infection

Not wearing a mask 17% risk of infection

stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators

Eye protection

Associated with less infection (n=3713) aOR = 0·22

Interpretation

Quantitative estimates for models and contact tracing policy

Robust randomised trials needed

Systematic appraisal of currently best available evidence

WHO, 1 metre

Guests & Subjects Covered

Lancet PhysicalCovid- SARS MERS NoInterpretation Quantitative

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Distance, masks and eye protection · Dr John Campbell · Sentinel