Dr John Campbell
@campbellteaching·3.3M subscribers·3.1K videos
Coronavirus, face coverings and culture
Posted
July 8, 2020
Views
68,787
Likes
2,682
Comments
1,380
Engagement
5.91%
July 8, 2020
68,787
2,682
1,380
5.91%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
13:01Now PlayingFace covering
Late April
UK, 25%
Italy, 83.4%
United States, 65.8%
Spain, 63.8%
Royal Society, Prof Ramakrishnan
Public remained sceptical about their benefits
The message has not been clear enough
Guidelines have been inconsistent.
‘What we would like for the government is to be a bit stronger and clearer about the messaging and require it whenever you are in crowded public spaces where you cannot get more than two metres away from the next person’
‘anti-social’
Public transport and hospitals
Scotland, mandatory on public transport, shops from 10 July
World Health Organization, advised since June
Prof Paul Edelstein, University of Pennsylvania
Evidence that they protected other people was ‘clearer all the time’
‘Some evidence’ they protected the wearer
‘There are people without symptoms going about their daily business who are unknowingly breathing out droplets that are carrying the virus’
‘If they had their faces covered the majority of those droplets would be caught before they can infect other people
Wearing face coverings can help save lives and prevent disabling illnesses’
1) IgM ( iMmediate action)
2) IgG (the aGglutinating antibody)
3) IgA (from sAliva, sweAt and teArs)
(IgE in typE 1 hypErsEnsitivity) Kathleen
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
