Just Asking Questions
@reasonjustaskingquestions·9.2K subscribers·130 videos
Trump vs. Massie: A History
Posted
March 11, 2025
Views
1,024
Likes
86
Comments
13
Engagement
9.67%
March 11, 2025
1,024
86
13
9.67%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
In this throwback JAQ clip, we dive into the first time Trump tried to primary Thomas Massie.
Full episode from Dec. 2023
When Thomas Massie insisted on an in-person vote for the $2 trillion CARES Act in March 2020, Donald Trump unleashed his fury, calling Massie a “third-rate grandstander” and threatening to take him down in a primary. Massie, facing an election where Trump had a 95% approval rating among GOP voters, stood his ground—arguing that if essential workers had to show up, so should Congress. He ended up winning that primary with 81% of the vote. Now, history may be repeating itself as Trump once again threatens to primary Massie.
In this clip, Massie reflects on that moment, the lasting consequences of pandemic spending, and the lack of remorse among lawmakers for COVID-era policies. He also discusses runaway government debt, how inflation is changing the conversation around spending, and why he still holds out a slim hope for fiscal responsibility in Washington.
Topics Covered:
➤ Trump’s 2020 attack on Massie over the CARES Act
➤ Why Massie insisted on an in-person vote
➤ The political risk of opposing Trump in a primary
➤ COVID policy regret (or lack thereof) in Congress
➤ The link between pandemic spending and inflation
➤ The growing problem of U.S. debt and rising borrowing costs
Text and links to sources available here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
